Converting from feet to meters is a subtle problem in writing scientific articles for lay audiences in the United States, and is likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Using Google, I picked four popular web sites to ask for a conversion factor. All four agreed that:
50 feet = 15.24 meters.
So that's the number we should use, right?
Wrong! At least in most cases, when we write "50 feet", we don't mean 50.00 feet.
We may mean 50 + 1 feet, 50 + 5 feet, 50 + 10 feet, or even 50 + 25 feet. Each "translates" differently.
50 feet converts to 15.24 meters, 51 feet to 15.5448 meters (using http://www.onlineconversion.com/length_common.htm), and 49 feet to 14.9352 meters; so 50 + 1 feet should be converted to 15.2 + 0.3 meters. (The extra two or three digits do not provide more accuracy here).
Similarly, 55 feet converts to 16.764 meters, and 45 feet to 13.716 meters; so 50 + 5 feet should be converted to 15 + 2 meters. 60 feet converts to 18.288 meters, and 40 feet to 12.192 meters; so 50 + 10 feet should be converted to 15 + 3 meters. Notice that the "translated" uncertainty for 10 feet is not the double of what it was for 5 feet!
Finally, the error for 50 + 25 feet is calculated as follows: 50 feet converts to 15.24 meters; 75 feet to 22.86 meters, and 25 feet to 7.62 meters; leading to a conversion of 50 + 25 feet to 15 + 8 meters.
If errors are not assigned, you are better off "translating" 50 feet as "about 15 meters."
A professor of mine used to say that a number is not complete without its uncertainty assessment. Another unrecollected source distinguished between "naked numbers" -- without uncertainty values -- and "clothed numbers" -- those with uncertainty listed. Try not to let your numbers freeze this winter.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment